Comments on: Injured Penalty http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul/2007/09/injured-penalty/ Random musings. Mostly about geek stuff, movies, and of course, the Nashville Predators Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:56:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: jc http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul/2007/09/injured-penalty/comment-page-1/#comment-599 jc Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:33:19 +0000 http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul/?p=310#comment-599 "draw blood" is referring to a high stick. This mind of thinking does not apply for other penalties. Would have had to takend Cheechoo's knee off in the play offs for that knee on knee to be a "major". You are getting penalties mixed up. <br></br><br>I dont know the exact ruling on this. I would think it would be an injury if the player had to leave the ice or had to be helped off. I dont recall (and my memory is going) there being a "major" for interference. That rule on its own is a very gray area.</br> “draw blood” is referring to a high stick. This mind of thinking does not apply for other penalties. Would have had to takend Cheechoo's knee off in the play offs for that knee on knee to be a “major”. You are getting penalties mixed up.

I dont know the exact ruling on this. I would think it would be an injury if the player had to leave the ice or had to be helped off. I dont recall (and my memory is going) there being a “major” for interference. That rule on its own is a very gray area.

]]> By: jc http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul/2007/09/injured-penalty/comment-page-1/#comment-295 jc Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:30:00 +0000 http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul/?p=310#comment-295 they changed some rules this year that are working towards the no obstruction/interference. I think I might blog on this tonight.<br/><br/>The interference rule has been altered to allow for a major penalty and a game misconduct when an injury results.<br/><br/>source:<br/>http://tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=219101&hubname=nhl they changed some rules this year that are working towards the no obstruction/interference. I think I might blog on this tonight.

The interference rule has been altered to allow for a major penalty and a game misconduct when an injury results.

source:
http://tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=219101&hubname=nhl

]]> By: jc http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul/2007/09/injured-penalty/comment-page-1/#comment-282 jc Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:15:00 +0000 http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul/?p=310#comment-282 "draw blood" is referring to a high stick. This mind of thinking does not apply for other penalties. Would have had to takend Cheechoo's knee off in the play offs for that knee on knee to be a "major". You are getting penalties mixed up. <br/><br/>I dont know the exact ruling on this. I would think it would be an injury if the player had to leave the ice or had to be helped off. I dont recall (and my memory is going) there being a "major" for interference. That rule on its own is a very gray area. “draw blood” is referring to a high stick. This mind of thinking does not apply for other penalties. Would have had to takend Cheechoo’s knee off in the play offs for that knee on knee to be a “major”. You are getting penalties mixed up.

I dont know the exact ruling on this. I would think it would be an injury if the player had to leave the ice or had to be helped off. I dont recall (and my memory is going) there being a “major” for interference. That rule on its own is a very gray area.

]]> By: Paul McCann http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul/2007/09/injured-penalty/comment-page-1/#comment-281 Paul McCann Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:07:00 +0000 http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul/?p=310#comment-281 Oh man... don’t get me started... I’ve ranted on this issue a few times... it’s complete crap. The action should be the penalty, not if there is an injury... Oh man… don’t get me started… I’ve ranted on this issue a few times… it’s complete crap. The action should be the penalty, not if there is an injury…

]]>